02
Jul,2020
67
/ 100
Overall Form
87
/ 100

Group Table

Playoffs 1-8
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Maccabi Petah Tikva
37218866372971
2
Bnei Sakhnin
371910860322867
3
Ramat Gan Givatayim
371791151361560
4
Hapoel Jerusalem
371611104233959
5
H. Rishon Lezion
371610114943658
6
FC Kafr Qasim
37168135348556
7
Tel Aviv Bat Yam
37157155154-352
8
Nir Ramat Hasharon
37147165060-1049
National League
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Maccabi Petah Tikva
30197462283464
2
H. Rishon Lezion
30159643291454
3
Hapoel Jerusalem
3014793730749
4
Bnei Sakhnin
30139846301648
5
Nir Ramat Hasharon
30137104243-146
6
Ramat Gan Givatayim
30128103729844
7
FC Kafr Qasim
30128104140144
8
Tel Aviv Bat Yam
30127114040043
9
Hapoel Umm AL Fahm
30109113538-339
10
H. Petah Tikva
30911104243-138
11
Hapoel Nof Hagalil
30910113637-137
12
Hapoel Acre
30810122427-334
13
Nazareth
30710133142-1131
14
Bnei Lod Rakevet
3075182659-3326
15
Ironi Ashkelon
3096153138-724
16
Hapoel Afula
30411152141-2023
Playoffs 9-16
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Hapoel Umm AL Fahm
361310134544149
2
H. Petah Tikva
361211135254-247
3
Hapoel Nof Hagalil
371112144548-345
4
Hapoel Acre
371013143032-243
5
Nazareth
371013144248-643
6
Hapoel Afula
37812173654-1836
7
Bnei Lod Rakevet
3596203469-3533
8
Ironi Ashkelon
3799193751-1427

Season form

shadow
highlight

100‏%

Form

shadow
highlight

30‏%

Form

Position by Round

Ramat Gan Givatayim
H. Rishon Lezion
Last matches
RGGHRL
Matches Scored at FT
3
1
Matches Scored at HT
2
1
Total Goals
9.00
2.00
Average goals scored
3.00
0.67
Scoring efficiency at HT
67‏%
33‏%
Scoring efficiency at FT
100‏%
33‏%
Goal margin at victories
2.33
0.00
Both teams scored
33‏%
33‏%
At least one goal
100‏%
100‏%
Failed to score
0‏%
67‏%
Clean sheets
67‏%
0‏%

Over/Under

RGGHRL
Over 0.5
89‏%
1.38
95‏%
1.32
Over 1.5
65‏%
1.38
73‏%
1.32
Over 2.5
43‏%
1.38
38‏%
1.32
Over 3.5
22‏%
1.38
24‏%
1.32
Over 4.5
8‏%
1.38
11‏%
1.32
Over 5.5
5‏%
1.38
5‏%
1.32
Under 0.5
11‏%
1.38
5‏%
1.32
Under 1.5
35‏%
1.38
27‏%
1.32
Under 2.5
57‏%
1.38
62‏%
1.32
Under 3.5
78‏%
1.38
76‏%
1.32
Under 4.5
92‏%
1.38
89‏%
1.32
Under 5.5
95‏%
1.38
95‏%
1.32