# | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | DIFF | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Beijing WFC | 22 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 33 | 18 | 15 | 41 | LDWWW |
2 | Liaoning Shenbei Hefeng | 22 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 30 | 17 | 13 | 40 | WDDWL |
3 | Jiangsu LFC | 22 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 30 | 20 | 10 | 40 | WWLDW |
4 | Shanghai Shengli | 22 | 8 | 12 | 2 | 33 | 17 | 16 | 36 | WDDWD |
5 | Wuhan Jiangda | 22 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 32 | 31 | 1 | 36 | LLWLL |
6 | Shandong Ticai | 22 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 32 | 25 | 7 | 35 | WWDDD |
7 | Changchun Jiuyin Loans | 22 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 28 | 22 | 6 | 34 | WLWWL |
8 | Guangdong Meizhou | 22 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 29 | 29 | 0 | 29 | DWDDW |
9 | Zhejiang Hangzhou | 22 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 26 | 33 | -7 | 25 | DDWLW |
10 | Shaanxi Chang An Athletic FC | 22 | 3 | 7 | 12 | 17 | 34 | -17 | 16 | DLLLL |
11 | Yongchuan Chashan | 22 | 3 | 6 | 13 | 14 | 34 | -20 | 15 | DLLDW |
12 | Henan Wanxianshan | 22 | 1 | 7 | 14 | 18 | 42 | -24 | 10 | DDLLL |
Season form
Position by Round
Liaoning Shenbei Hefeng
Beijing WFC
Last matches- Liaoning Shenbei Hefeng
Last matches- Beijing WFC
Last matches
| LIA | BEP | |
|---|---|---|
| Matches Scored at FT | 2 2 / 3 | 3 3 / 3 |
| Matches Scored at HT | 0 0 / 3 | 0 0 / 3 |
| Total Goals | 5.00 | 7.00 |
| Average goals scored | 1.67 5 / 3 | 2.33 7 / 3 |
| Scoring efficiency at HT | 0% 0 / 3 | 0% 0 / 3 |
| Scoring efficiency at FT | 67% 2 / 3 | 100% 3 / 3 |
| Goal margin at victories | 2.00 1W | 2.00 3W |
| Both teams scored | 67% 2 / 3 | 33% 1 / 3 |
| At least one goal | 100% 3 / 3 | 100% 3 / 3 |
| Failed to score | 33% 1 / 3 | 0% 0 / 3 |
| Clean sheets | 0% 0 / 3 | 67% 2 / 3 |
Over/Under
| LIA | BEP | |
|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 86% 1.36 | 95% 1.5 |
| Over 1.5 | 59% 1.36 | 68% 1.5 |
| Over 2.5 | 41% 1.36 | 32% 1.5 |
| Over 3.5 | 18% 1.36 | 18% 1.5 |
| Over 4.5 | 5% 1.36 | 9% 1.5 |
| Over 5.5 | 5% 1.36 | 9% 1.5 |
| Under 0.5 | 14% 1.36 | 5% 1.5 |
| Under 1.5 | 41% 1.36 | 32% 1.5 |
| Under 2.5 | 59% 1.36 | 68% 1.5 |
| Under 3.5 | 82% 1.36 | 82% 1.5 |
| Under 4.5 | 95% 1.36 | 91% 1.5 |
| Under 5.5 | 95% 1.36 | 91% 1.5 |