Matchday 24
|
18
Apr,2026
13
/ 17
League Position
1
/ 17
53
/ 100
Overall Form
53
/ 100

Group Table

CFL 25/26, Group A
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Kladno
21154265194649
2
FC Viktoria Plzen B
21134447321543
3
Tj Jiskra Domazlice
20133447272042
4
Pisek
20114533221137
5
SK Slavia Prague C
2110473627934
6
Dukla Prague B
2110293434032
7
Ad. Praha
208572729-229
8
FK Loko Prague
208482426-228
9
FK Pribram B
2191113338-528
10
Aritma Prague
216962729-227
11
Kraluv Dvur
2183103341-827
12
Bohemians Prague B
2173113941-224
13
SK Dynamo Ceske Budejovice B
206682835-724
14
Sokol Hostoun
2173112333-1024
15
Petrin Plzen
2162133047-1720
16
Motorlet
2146112034-1418
17
Mas Taborsko II
2123161951-329
CFL 25/26, Group B
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Ceska Lipa
20181148123655
2
Zapy
21164147163152
3
FC Hradec Kralove B
20142442202244
4
Banik Most-Sous
21122738261238
5
FK Teplice B
21114632211137
6
FK Jablonec B
2010283537-232
7
Benatky Nad Jizerou
207583234-226
8
FK Pardubice B
216694339424
9
Velke Hamry
196673432224
10
Byskovice
206592533-823
11
Tj Jiskra Usti Nad Orlici
215792231-922
12
FK Mlada Boleslav B
205692435-1121
13
Sparta Kolin
2131173139-820
14
Slovan Liberec B
2147103742-519
15
Tj Slovan Velvary
2152143151-2017
16
Brozany
2043132749-2215
17
Varnsdorf
2135132152-3114

Season form

shadow
highlight

60‏%

Form

shadow
highlight

60‏%

Form

Position by Round

SK Dynamo Ceske Budejovice B
Kladno
Last matches
DYNKLA
Matches Scored at FT
3
3
Matches Scored at HT
3
2
Total Goals
3.00
5.00
Average goals scored
1.00
1.67
Scoring efficiency at HT
100‏%
67‏%
Scoring efficiency at FT
100‏%
100‏%
Goal margin at victories
1.00
2.00
Both teams scored
67‏%
67‏%
At least one goal
100‏%
100‏%
Failed to score
0‏%
0‏%
Clean sheets
33‏%
33‏%

Over/Under

DYNKLA
Over 0.5
90‏%
1.4
95‏%
3.1
Over 1.5
85‏%
1.4
95‏%
3.1
Over 2.5
70‏%
1.4
76‏%
3.1
Over 3.5
50‏%
1.4
57‏%
3.1
Over 4.5
15‏%
1.4
48‏%
3.1
Over 5.5
5‏%
1.4
14‏%
3.1
Under 0.5
10‏%
1.4
5‏%
3.1
Under 1.5
15‏%
1.4
5‏%
3.1
Under 2.5
30‏%
1.4
24‏%
3.1
Under 3.5
50‏%
1.4
43‏%
3.1
Under 4.5
85‏%
1.4
52‏%
3.1
Under 5.5
95‏%
1.4
86‏%
3.1