06
Jun,2026
47
/ 100
Overall Form
67
/ 100

Group Table

2. Liga, Division A 25/26, Stage 1, Group Gold
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Veles
1896326121433
2
Volgar Astrakhan
189541811732
3
Ivanovo
188642416830
4
Mashuk-KMV
188642017330
5
Novosibirsk
187382618824
6
Leningradets
187382225-324
7
FC Tyumen
186573126523
8
Kirov
185582024-420
9
FC Alania Vladikavkaz
1852111930-1117
10
Dinamo Moscow R.
18198936-2712
2. Liga, Division A 25/26, Stage 1, Group Silver
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Rodina-2
147431812625
2
Kaluga
147342014624
3
Torpedo Miass
144821412220
4
Irtysh Omsk
144731513219
5
Kuban Krasnodar
144641414018
6
Dynamo Vladivostok
145271316-317
7
Kursk
143471423-913
8
Murom
142661317-412
2. Liga, Division A 25/26, Stage 2, Group Gold
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Leningradets
107211410423
2
Veles
107121541122
3
Novosibirsk
105231514117
4
Ivanovo
105141812616
5
Mashuk-KMV
1018177011
6
Kaluga
10325912-311
7
Rodina-2
102441012-210
8
Torpedo Miass
10244812-410
9
Volgar Astrakhan
102351012-29
10
Irtysh Omsk
10136718-116
2. Liga, Division A 25/26, Stage 2, Group Silver
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
FC Alania Vladikavkaz
10622158720
2
Amkar Perm
105322214818
3
Dynamo Bryansk
10523912-317
4
Kirov
103611410415
5
Dinamo Moscow R.
104331718-115
6
Dynamo Vladivostok
103521310314
7
FC Tyumen
103341211112
8
St Petersburg
102351620-49
9
Kuban Krasnodar
10235914-59
10
Stavropol
10127818-105

Season form

shadow
highlight

50‏%

Form

shadow
highlight

70‏%

Form

Last matches
ALAAMK
Matches Scored at FT
1
2
Matches Scored at HT
0
2
Total Goals
2.00
7.00
Average goals scored
0.67
2.33
Scoring efficiency at HT
0‏%
67‏%
Scoring efficiency at FT
33‏%
67‏%
Goal margin at victories
0.00
2.50
Both teams scored
33‏%
33‏%
At least one goal
67‏%
67‏%
Failed to score
67‏%
33‏%
Clean sheets
33‏%
67‏%

Over/Under

ALAAMK
Over 0.5
89‏%
1.21
90‏%
2.2
Over 1.5
71‏%
1.21
90‏%
2.2
Over 2.5
46‏%
1.21
50‏%
2.2
Over 3.5
25‏%
1.21
50‏%
2.2
Over 4.5
14‏%
1.21
40‏%
2.2
Over 5.5
7‏%
1.21
20‏%
2.2
Under 0.5
11‏%
1.21
10‏%
2.2
Under 1.5
29‏%
1.21
10‏%
2.2
Under 2.5
54‏%
1.21
50‏%
2.2
Under 3.5
75‏%
1.21
50‏%
2.2
Under 4.5
86‏%
1.21
60‏%
2.2
Under 5.5
93‏%
1.21
80‏%
2.2