Gil Garcia, Aaron - Wassermann, Miko | Match report | StatsHub

Surface

Carpet indoor

|

05

Mar,2026

shadow

highlight

Gil Garcia, Aaron

shadow

highlight

Wassermann, Miko

Ended

0

:

2

40

/ 100

Form

80

/ 100

L

1:2

L

0:2

2:0

W

L

0:2

2:0

W

WDL Direction

2:0

W

L

0:2

2:0

W

2:0

W

2:0

W

WDL Direction

Statistics

GIL

WAS

GIL

WAS

8Aces9

1Double Faults1

61‏%1st Serve Successful57‏%

96‏%2nd Serve Successful97‏%

64‏%1st Serve Pts. Won73‏%

61‏%2nd Serve Pts. Won60‏%

-Service Points Won-

-Service Games Won-

-Break Points Won-

-Receiver Points Won-

60Points won69

5Max Points in a Row8

8Games won12

2Max Games in a Row3

0Tiebreaks Won0

Match Radar

Match Radar

FavoritesFavorites

Next match

-

PinnedPinned

Live

Upcoming

-

-

Highlights

Gil Garcia, Aaron

Wassermann, Miko

‌

0

‌

2

‌

4

‌

6

‌

4

‌

6

T

1

2

Gil Garcia, Aaron

Wassermann, Miko

2nd set(4 - 6)

TENNISMatch won (4 : 6)

Question Mark

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(15 : 40)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(15 : 30)

Point

Question Mark

(15 : 15)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(15 : 0)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

TENNISGame won (4 : 5)

Question Mark

Point

Question Mark

(40 : 0)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(30 : 0)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(15 : 0)

Point

TENNISGame won (3 : 5)

Question Mark

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(15 : 40)

game point

Question Mark

(15 : 30)

Point

Question Mark

(0 : 30)

Point

Question Mark

(0 : 15)

Ace

TENNISGame won (3 : 4)

Question Mark

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(50 : 40)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(40 : 40)

Point

Question Mark

(40 : 30)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(30 : 30)

Ace

Question Mark

(15 : 30)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(15 : 15)

Point

Question Mark

(15 : 0)

Point

TENNISGame won (2 : 4)

Question Mark

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(40 : 50)

Point

Question Mark

(40 : 40)

Ace

Question Mark

(40 : 30)

Point

Question Mark

(30 : 30)

Point

Question Mark

(30 : 15)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(15 : 15)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(15 : 0)

Point

TENNISGame won (2 : 3)

Question Mark

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(40 : 15)

game point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(40 : 0)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(30 : 0)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(15 : 0)

Point

TENNISGame won (1 : 3)

Question Mark

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(0 : 40)

Point

Question Mark

(0 : 30)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(0 : 15)

Ace

TENNISGame won (1 : 2)

Question Mark

Game won

Question Mark

(40 : 0)

Point

Question Mark

(30 : 0)

Point

Question Mark

(15 : 0)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

TENNISGame won (0 : 2)

Question Mark

Game won

Question Mark

(30 : 40)

Point

Question Mark

(30 : 30)

Point

Question Mark

(30 : 15)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(15 : 15)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(0 : 15)

Ace

TENNISGame won (0 : 1)

Question Mark

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(15 : 40)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(15 : 30)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(0 : 30)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(0 : 15)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

1st set(4 - 6)