Matchday 3
|
12
Nov,2022
Limited coverage
Ended
0
:
3
60
/ 100
Overall Form
60
/ 100

Group Table

China Volleyball League, Women 22/23
#
Team
P
W
L
Points
Sets
Sets diff.
PCT set
P won
PCT point
Form
1
Tianjin
131303939-138391008-6661.514
2
Shenzhen Australian Tiger
131123233-112231018-8821.154
3
Shanghai
131123035-15202.3331139-9831.159
4
Jiangsu
131033033-13202.5381039-9251.123
5
Fujian
13942730-151521034-8931.158
6
Beijing
13852530-19111.5791082-9961.086
7
Shandong
13852430-20101.51129-9851.146
8
Liaoning Huachen
13672023-24-10.9581027-9371.096
9
Sichuan
13581315-30-150.5884-10460.845
10
Guangdong
13491216-29-130.552921-10380.887
11
Henan
13310913-34-210.382903-10880.83
12
Zhejiang
13211711-34-230.324903-10510.859
13
Yunnan
1311237-38-310.184810-10660.76
14
Hebei
1301327-39-320.179770-11110.693
China Volleyball League, Women 22/23, Championship Round, Gr. 1
#
Team
P
W
L
Points
Sets
Sets diff.
PCT set
P won
PCT point
Form
1
Tianjin
33099-090225-1421.585
2
Jiangsu
32166-332204-1651.236
3
Fujian
31233-6-30.5172-2000.86
4
Liaoning Huachen
30300-9-90131-2250.582
China Volleyball League, Women 22/23, Placement 9-14
#
Team
P
W
L
Points
Sets
Sets diff.
PCT set
P won
PCT point
Form
1
Henan
5501415-3125425-3551.197
2
Zhejiang
5411113-761.857458-4610.993
3
Guangdong
5321012-662441-3931.122
4
Sichuan
52356-11-50.545362-3860.938
5
Hebei
51446-13-70.462398-4410.902
6
Yunnan
50513-15-120.2374-4220.886
China Volleyball League, Women 22/23, Championship Round, Gr. 2
#
Team
P
W
L
Points
Sets
Sets diff.
PCT set
P won
PCT point
Form
1
Shanghai
33099-189250-1841.359
2
Beijing
32156-601252-2780.906
3
Shenzhen Australian Tiger
31246-7-10.857304-3060.993
4
Shandong
30302-9-70.222239-2770.863

Season form

shadow
highlight

100‏%

Form

shadow
highlight

60‏%

Form

Position by Round

Henan
Shanghai

Over/Under

HENSHG
Over 135.5
44‏%
73.78
45‏%
82.5
Over 150.5
33‏%
73.78
36‏%
82.5
Over 165.5
33‏%
73.78
36‏%
82.5
Over 180.5
28‏%
73.78
32‏%
82.5
Under 135.5
56‏%
73.78
55‏%
82.5
Under 150.5
67‏%
73.78
64‏%
82.5
Under 165.5
67‏%
73.78
64‏%
82.5
Under 180.5
72‏%
73.78
68‏%
82.5