Wassermann, Miko - Van Zijl, Twan | Match report | Betradar

Surface

Carpet indoor

|

Semifinals

|

31

Jan,2026

shadow

highlight

Wassermann, Miko

shadow

highlight

Ended

2

:

0

20

/ 100

Form

0

/ 100

L

0:2

L

1:2

L

0:2

2:0

W

L

0:2

WDL Direction

L

0:2

L

0:2

L

1:2

L

0:2

L

0:2

WDL Direction

Statistics

WAS

VZT

WAS

VZT

4Aces1

2Double Faults0

68‏%1st Serve Successful78‏%

93‏%2nd Serve Successful100‏%

73‏%1st Serve Pts. Won64‏%

46‏%2nd Serve Pts. Won53‏%

-Service Points Won-

-Service Games Won-

-Break Points Won-

-Receiver Points Won-

85Points won78

8Max Points in a Row5

14Games won11

3Max Games in a Row2

1Tiebreaks Won0

Match Radar

Match Radar

FavoritesFavorites

Next match

-

PinnedPinned

Live

Upcoming

-

-

Highlights

Wassermann, Miko

‌

2

‌

0

‌

7

‌

6₆

‌

7

‌

5

T

1

2

Wassermann, Miko

Van Zijl, Twan

2nd set(7 - 5)

TENNISMatch won (7 : 5)

Question Mark

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(40 : 15)

Point

Question Mark

(30 : 15)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(15 : 15)

Point

Question Mark

(15 : 0)

Point

TENNISGame won (6 : 5)

Question Mark

Point

Question Mark

(50 : 40)

Point

Question Mark

(40 : 40)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(40 : 30)

Point

Question Mark

(30 : 30)

Point

Question Mark

(30 : 15)

Point

Question Mark

(15 : 15)

Double fault

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(15 : 0)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

TENNISGame won (5 : 5)

Question Mark

Point

Question Mark

(15 : 40)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(15 : 30)

Point

Question Mark

(15 : 15)

Point

Question Mark

(0 : 15)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

TENNISGame won (5 : 4)

Question Mark

Point

Question Mark

(40 : 30)

Point

Question Mark

(40 : 15)

Point

Question Mark

(30 : 15)

Point

Question Mark

(15 : 15)

Point

Question Mark

(0 : 15)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

TENNISGame won (4 : 4)

Question Mark

Point

Question Mark

(0 : 40)

Point

Question Mark

(0 : 30)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(0 : 15)

Point

TENNISGame won (4 : 3)

Question Mark

Point

Question Mark

(40 : 30)

Point

Question Mark

(30 : 30)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(15 : 30)

Point

Question Mark

(15 : 15)

Point

Question Mark

(0 : 15)

Point

TENNISGame won (3 : 3)

Question Mark

Point

Question Mark

(40 : 50)

Point

Question Mark

(40 : 40)

Point

Question Mark

(30 : 40)

Point

Question Mark

(30 : 30)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(30 : 15)

Point

Question Mark

(15 : 15)

Point

Question Mark

(15 : 0)

Point

TENNISGame won (3 : 2)

Question Mark

Point

Question Mark

(40 : 30)

game point

Question Mark

(30 : 30)

Point

Question Mark

(30 : 15)

Point

Question Mark

(15 : 15)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(0 : 15)

Point

TENNISGame won (2 : 2)

Question Mark

Point

Question Mark

(40 : 15)

Point

Question Mark

(30 : 15)

Point

Question Mark

(15 : 15)

Point

Question Mark

(0 : 15)

Point

TENNISGame won (1 : 2)

Question Mark

Point

Question Mark

(15 : 40)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(0 : 40)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(0 : 30)

Point

Question Mark

(0 : 15)

Point

TENNISGame won (1 : 1)

Question Mark

Point

Question Mark

(15 : 40)

Point

Question Mark

(0 : 40)

Point

Question Mark

(0 : 30)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(0 : 15)

Point

TENNISGame won (1 : 0)

Question Mark

Point

Question Mark

(40 : 0)

Point

Question Mark

(30 : 0)

Point

Question Mark

First serve fault

Question Mark

(15 : 0)

Point

1st set(7 - 6)