Matchday 32
|
15
Dec,2021
Limited coverage
Ended
3
:
1
FT3:1
HT2:0
5
/ 18
League Position
13
/ 18
27
/ 100
Overall Form
67
/ 100

Group Table

China League 1
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Wuhan Three Towns FC
34254573254879
2
Meizhou Hakka
34243779354475
3
Zhejiang Prof.
34228469284174
4
Chengdu Rongcheng
34218581285371
5
Nantong Zhiyun
34205962303265
6
Shaanxi Chang'an
341711655302562
7
Jiangxi Dingnan United
341511850401056
8
Shenzhen Peng City
34131383427752
9
Kunshan
341312956352151
10
Nanjing City
34129134142-145
11
Zibo Cuju
34109153252-2039
12
Guizhou
34109152656-3039
13
Suzhou Dongwu
34711163653-1732
14
Jiangxi Lushan
3478192968-3929
15
Beijing Sport Uni.
34610183753-1628
16
Liaoning Tieren
3474233062-3225
17
Beijing IT
3435262482-5814
18
X. T. Leopard
3416271684-689
Group A
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Meizhou Hakka
10712189922
2
Zhejiang Prof.
1063121101121
3
Shaanxi Chang'an
10532159618
4
Shenzhen Peng City
1034384413
5
Zibo Cuju
10046518-134
6
X. T. Leopard
10118825-174
Group B
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Chengdu Rongcheng
106311910921
2
Nantong Zhiyun
106221711620
3
Kunshan
103611912715
4
Nanjing City
1034379-213
5
Jiangxi Lushan
102261020-108
6
Beijing Sport Uni.
10037717-103
Group C
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Wuhan Three Towns FC
1062224101420
2
Jiangxi Dingnan United
106131411319
3
Guizhou
1043388015
4
Liaoning Tieren
104151314-113
5
Suzhou Dongwu
103431113-213
6
Beijing IT
101181125-144

Season form

shadow
highlight

70‏%

Form

shadow
highlight

40‏%

Form

Position by Round

Nantong Zhiyun
Suzhou Dongwu
Last matches
NANSUD
Matches Scored at FT
3
3
Matches Scored at HT
2
2
Total Goals
6.00
5.00
Average goals scored
2.00
1.67
Scoring efficiency at HT
67‏%
67‏%
Scoring efficiency at FT
100‏%
100‏%
Goal margin at victories
2.00
1.00
Both teams scored
67‏%
100‏%
At least one goal
100‏%
100‏%
Failed to score
0‏%
0‏%
Clean sheets
33‏%
0‏%

Over/Under

NANSUD
Over 0.5
97‏%
1.82
91‏%
1.06
Over 1.5
76‏%
1.82
74‏%
1.06
Over 2.5
53‏%
1.82
56‏%
1.06
Over 3.5
24‏%
1.82
32‏%
1.06
Over 4.5
12‏%
1.82
9‏%
1.06
Over 5.5
6‏%
1.82
0‏%
1.06
Under 0.5
3‏%
1.82
9‏%
1.06
Under 1.5
24‏%
1.82
26‏%
1.06
Under 2.5
47‏%
1.82
44‏%
1.06
Under 3.5
76‏%
1.82
68‏%
1.06
Under 4.5
88‏%
1.82
91‏%
1.06
Under 5.5
94‏%
1.82
100‏%
1.06