09
Sep,2023
60
/ 100
Overall Form
27
/ 100

Group Table

Group A
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Qingdao Red Lions
14101321101131
2
Dalian Yingbo FC
149412071331
3
Beijing IT
145541110120
4
Hubei Istar
145451513219
5
Taian Tiankuang
144641617-118
6
Nantong Haimen Codion
143741510516
7
Wuhan Jiangcheng
142571023-1311
8
Zibo Qisheng
140410624-184
Group B
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Chongqing Tonglianglong FC
1411303492536
2
Guangxi Lanhang
14842159628
3
Yunnan Yukun
1483333112227
4
Wenzhou Professional
145271121-1017
5
Shaoxing Shangyu Pterosaur
144191430-1613
6
Hunan Xiangtao
143471728-1113
7
Quanzhou Yaxin
143381421-712
8
Kunming City Star
143291019-911
Promotion Round
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Chongqing Tonglianglong FC
22154349143549
2
Dalian Yingbo FC
22145330121847
3
Yunnan Yukun
22136347173045
4
Qingdao Red Lions
22135430141644
5
Guangxi Lanhang
2211562019138
6
Beijing IT
227691725-827
7
Wenzhou Professional
2274111630-1425
8
Hubei Istar
2265112028-823
Relegation Round
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Nantong Haimen Codion
2297639201934
2
Taian Tiankuang
2297639261334
3
Wuhan Jiangcheng
226792635-925
4
Kunming City Star
2274112127-625
5
Hunan Xiangtao
2274112646-2025
6
Quanzhou Yaxin
2255122134-1320
7
Shaoxing Shangyu Pterosaur
2252152455-3117
8
Zibo Qisheng
221615730-239

Season form

shadow
highlight

50‏%

Form

shadow
highlight

60‏%

Form

Position by Round

Chongqing Tonglianglong FC
Dalian Yingbo FC
Last matches
CHODAL
Matches Scored at FT
0
2
Matches Scored at HT
0
0
Total Goals
0.00
2.00
Average goals scored
0.00
0.67
Scoring efficiency at HT
0‏%
0‏%
Scoring efficiency at FT
0‏%
67‏%
Goal margin at victories
0.00
1.00
Both teams scored
0‏%
0‏%
At least one goal
67‏%
100‏%
Failed to score
100‏%
33‏%
Clean sheets
33‏%
67‏%

Over/Under

CHODAL
Over 0.5
91‏%
2.23
91‏%
1.36
Over 1.5
82‏%
2.23
55‏%
1.36
Over 2.5
55‏%
2.23
32‏%
1.36
Over 3.5
32‏%
2.23
14‏%
1.36
Over 4.5
18‏%
2.23
0‏%
1.36
Over 5.5
5‏%
2.23
0‏%
1.36
Under 0.5
9‏%
2.23
9‏%
1.36
Under 1.5
18‏%
2.23
45‏%
1.36
Under 2.5
45‏%
2.23
68‏%
1.36
Under 3.5
68‏%
2.23
86‏%
1.36
Under 4.5
82‏%
2.23
100‏%
1.36
Under 5.5
95‏%
2.23
100‏%
1.36