Chang, Dylan - Guilleme, Joaquin | Statistiken

Group Table

Winston-Salem M01, Group A

#	Mannschaft	SP	S	N	SW	SL
1	Fahim, Ilyas Milad	3	3	0	4	0
2	Crivei, Eric	3	1	2	2	4
3	Gray, Spencer	3	1	2	2	4
4	Lieberman, Henry	2	1	1	2	2
5	Tacchi, Luciano	1	0	1	0	0

Winston-Salem M01, Group B

#	Mannschaft	SP	S	N	SW	SL
1	Goodman, Tal	3	2	1	4	2
2	Hashimoto, Hugo	3	2	1	5	3
3	Phillips, Joseph	3	2	1	4	3
4	Mazev, Martin	3	0	3	1	6

Winston-Salem M01, Group C

#	Mannschaft	SP	S	N	SW	SL
1	Ciric, Aleksa	3	3	0	6	1
2	Saye, David	3	2	1	5	2
3	Patrick, Nicholas	3	1	2	2	4
4	Parichkov, Nikola	3	0	3	0	6

Winston-Salem M01, Group D

#	Mannschaft	SP	S	N	SW	SL
1	Thomson, Matthew	3	3	0	6	1
2	Chung, Justin	3	2	1	4	3
3	Bompieri, Paolo	3	1	2	3	4
4	Zauber, Ariel	3	0	3	1	6

Winston-Salem M01, Group E

#	Mannschaft	SP	S	N	SW	SL
1	Frusina, Alexander	3	3	0	6	1
2	Zapp, Logan	3	2	1	2	2
3	Templeman, Jayden	3	1	2	3	5
4	Shalmi, Cornelius Alexander	3	0	3	1	4

Winston-Salem M01, Group F

#	Mannschaft	SP	S	N	SW	SL
1	Guilleme, Joaquin	3	3	0	6	0
2	Mayew, Ian	3	2	1	4	2
3	El Amine, Hamza	3	1	2	2	4
4	Chang, Dylan	3	0	3	0	6

Winston-Salem M01, Group G

#	Mannschaft	SP	S	N	SW	SL
1	Palta, Sachin	3	3	0	6	1
2	Bharadwaj, Shaurya	3	2	1	5	3
3	Thursfield, Harry	3	1	2	1	4
4	Murray, Freddy	2	0	2	0	2
5	Stice, Tyler	1	0	1	0	2

Winston-Salem M01, Group H

#	Mannschaft	SP	S	N	SW	SL
1	Capalbo, Franco	3	3	0	6	0
2	Nicholson, Samuel	3	2	1	4	2
3	Young, Robbie	2	1	1	2	3
4	Vyas, Aditya	3	0	3	1	6
5	You, Junghee	1	0	1	0	2

Rangliste

#	Spieler	Punkte
1148	Guilleme, Joaquin	10

Saisonform

Chang, Dylan

0‏%

Formtabelle

N

0:2

N

0:2

N

0:2

SNU-Richtung

Guilleme, Joaquin

80‏%

Formtabelle

2:0

S

2:0

S

2:1

S

2:0

S

N

0:2

SNU-Richtung

Belag Gewinnrate

100‏%

50‏%

''

Gesamt

Hartplatz

Chang, Dylan

Guilleme, Joaquin

Saison Statistiken

Statistiken	CHA	GUI
First Serves Successful	40.5‏%	56.8‏%
First Serve Won	53.8‏%	64.2‏%
Second Serves Successful	39.1‏%	47.0‏%
Second Serve Won	41.0‏%	61.0‏%
Doppelfehler	6.5‏%	1.2‏%
Service Games Won	28.8‏%	55.5‏%
Asse	1.5‏%	0.7‏%
Serves Won	49.1‏%	63.4‏%
Break point conversion	19.23‏%	44.0‏%
Tie Breaks Played	0	2
Tie Breaks Won	-‏%	50.0‏%