Table
North
Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | DIFF | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Yinchuan Helanshan | 22 | 14 | 3 | 5 | 34 | 14 | 20 | 45 | WWLWW |
2 | Qingdao Hainiu | 22 | 12 | 8 | 2 | 27 | 8 | 19 | 44 | DWWWL |
3 | Jiangxi Dingnan United | 22 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 36 | 14 | 22 | 43 | LWDWW |
4 | Shaanxi Chang'an | 22 | 12 | 6 | 4 | 26 | 14 | 12 | 42 | DWWLW |
5 | Hebei Zhuoao | 22 | 13 | 3 | 6 | 41 | 24 | 17 | 42 | WLDLD |
6 | Liaoning Tieren | 22 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 25 | 15 | 10 | 39 | WLLWD |
7 | Jiangsu Yancheng Dingli | 22 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 21 | 30 | -9 | 25 | DWWDD |
8 | Beijing IT | 22 | 5 | 8 | 9 | 25 | 30 | -5 | 23 | LLLWD |
9 | Dalian Chanjoy | 22 | 4 | 8 | 10 | 19 | 31 | -12 | 20 | LLLLD |
10 | Jilin Baijia | 22 | 3 | 10 | 9 | 15 | 28 | -13 | 19 | DWDDD |
11 | Dongjin | 22 | 1 | 7 | 14 | 11 | 34 | -23 | 10 | WLDLL |
12 | Caoshangfei | 22 | 2 | 1 | 19 | 14 | 52 | -38 | 7 | LLWLL |
South
Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | DIFF | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Shenzhen Ledman | 22 | 16 | 4 | 2 | 49 | 12 | 37 | 52 | WWWWW |
2 | Sichuan Longfor | 22 | 14 | 5 | 3 | 37 | 16 | 21 | 47 | LWWWW |
3 | Guangdong | 22 | 12 | 3 | 7 | 33 | 21 | 12 | 39 | LLDWL |
4 | Nantong Zhiyun | 22 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 22 | 15 | 7 | 38 | DWDLW |
5 | Chengdu Rongcheng | 22 | 9 | 8 | 5 | 22 | 18 | 4 | 35 | DLWWD |
6 | Suzhou Dongwu | 22 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 24 | 15 | 9 | 35 | WDDLW |
7 | Jiangxi Lushan | 22 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 23 | 20 | 3 | 34 | LDDWW |
8 | Hunan Xiangtao | 22 | 8 | 4 | 10 | 28 | 28 | 0 | 28 | WLLLD |
9 | Shanghai Sunfun | 22 | 5 | 4 | 13 | 21 | 45 | -24 | 19 | LLLWL |
10 | Shanghai Juju Sports | 22 | 4 | 6 | 12 | 17 | 35 | -18 | 18 | WWWLL |
11 | Hainan Haihan | 22 | 5 | 2 | 15 | 13 | 33 | -20 | 17 | DWLLL |
12 | Kunshan | 22 | 0 | 5 | 17 | 18 | 49 | -31 | 5 | DLLLL |
Over / Under table
| # | Team | MP | Over 0.5 | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingdao Hainiu | 22 | 73% | 55% | 23% | 5% | 5% | - |
| 2 | Beijing IT | 22 | 82% | 68% | 50% | 27% | 9% | 5% |
| 3 | Hunan Xiangtao | 22 | 95% | 73% | 50% | 18% | 14% | 5% |
| 4 | Dongjin | 22 | 82% | 55% | 32% | 18% | 9% | 9% |
| 5 | Guangdong | 22 | 95% | 77% | 59% | 14% | - | - |
| 6 | Suzhou Dongwu | 22 | 95% | 45% | 27% | 9% | - | - |
| 7 | Jiangxi Lushan | 22 | 91% | 55% | 32% | 14% | 5% | - |
| 8 | Jiangxi Dingnan United | 22 | 86% | 59% | 32% | 23% | 14% | 9% |
| 9 | Hainan Haihan | 22 | 100% | 50% | 23% | 18% | 14% | 5% |
| 10 | Chengdu Rongcheng | 22 | 86% | 50% | 23% | 14% | 5% | 5% |
| 11 | Liaoning Tieren | 22 | 82% | 59% | 36% | 5% | - | - |
| 12 | Dalian Chanjoy | 22 | 86% | 73% | 36% | 23% | 5% | 5% |
| 13 | Shanghai Sunfun | 22 | 91% | 77% | 59% | 45% | 23% | 5% |
| 14 | Shaanxi Chang'an | 22 | 91% | 55% | 23% | 14% | - | - |
| 15 | Kunshan | 22 | 100% | 73% | 59% | 36% | 18% | 14% |
| 16 | Shenzhen Ledman | 22 | 100% | 82% | 45% | 27% | 14% | 5% |
| 17 | Jilin Baijia | 22 | 73% | 59% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 5% |
| 18 | Hebei Zhuoao | 22 | 100% | 68% | 50% | 32% | 23% | 14% |
| 19 | Yinchuan Helanshan | 22 | 91% | 73% | 36% | 14% | 5% | - |
| 20 | Caoshangfei | 22 | 100% | 77% | 59% | 23% | 14% | 14% |
| 21 | Jiangsu Yancheng Dingli | 22 | 91% | 64% | 36% | 27% | 5% | 5% |
| 22 | Shanghai Juju Sports | 22 | 95% | 68% | 36% | 23% | 14% | - |
| 23 | Nantong Zhiyun | 22 | 91% | 59% | 18% | - | - | - |
| 24 | Sichuan Longfor | 22 | 95% | 64% | 41% | 27% | 14% | - |
MP
Matches played
Over ##
Matches where the total number of Goals was over ##