26
Apr,2021
Limited coverage
Ended
0
:
0
FT0:0
HT0:0
40
/ 100
Overall Form
0
/ 100

Group Table

National League
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Hapoel Nof Hagalil
30169539201957
2
Hapoel Jerusalem
301412437162154
3
Ness Ziona
30121082830-246
4
Tel Aviv Bat Yam
30128104436844
5
Nir Ramat Hasharon
30111092723443
6
Hapoel Iksal
30111094242043
7
H. Rishon Lezion
3091563227542
8
Ramat Gan Givatayim
3091383328540
9
Hapoel Afula
30109113228439
10
Nazareth
30109113231139
11
Ra`anana
30811113031-135
12
FC Kafr Qasim
3071492531-635
13
Hapoel Umm AL Fahm
30711122133-1232
14
Hapoel Acre
3051692235-1331
15
H. Petah Tikva
3069151730-1327
16
Hapoel Kfar Shelem
3068163252-2026
Playoffs 1-8
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Hapoel Nof Hagalil
372012557263172
2
Hapoel Jerusalem
371914452203271
3
Ness Ziona
371611103738-159
4
H. Rishon Lezion
37121784135653
5
Tel Aviv Bat Yam
371312125548751
6
Ramat Gan Givatayim
371115114438648
7
Nir Ramat Hasharon
371211143230247
8
Hapoel Iksal
371111154467-2344
Playoffs 9-16
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Hapoel Afula
3713101450391149
2
Ra`anana
371212134742548
3
Nazareth
37129163747-1045
4
FC Kafr Qasim
37915133240-842
5
Hapoel Acre
37818113443-942
6
Hapoel Umm AL Fahm
371012153041-1142
7
H. Petah Tikva
371011162233-1141
8
Hapoel Kfar Shelem
37810193764-2734

Season form

shadow
highlight

30‏%

Form

shadow
highlight

80‏%

Form

Position by Round

Hapoel Kfar Shelem
Hapoel Acre
Last matches
HKFHAC
Matches Scored at FT
2
2
Matches Scored at HT
1
1
Total Goals
3.00
7.00
Average goals scored
1.00
2.33
Scoring efficiency at HT
33‏%
33‏%
Scoring efficiency at FT
67‏%
67‏%
Goal margin at victories
2.00
3.00
Both teams scored
33‏%
33‏%
At least one goal
100‏%
67‏%
Failed to score
33‏%
33‏%
Clean sheets
33‏%
67‏%

Over/Under

HKFHAC
Over 0.5
92‏%
1
70‏%
0.92
Over 1.5
73‏%
1
54‏%
0.92
Over 2.5
46‏%
1
30‏%
0.92
Over 3.5
32‏%
1
27‏%
0.92
Over 4.5
16‏%
1
22‏%
0.92
Over 5.5
8‏%
1
5‏%
0.92
Under 0.5
8‏%
1
30‏%
0.92
Under 1.5
27‏%
1
46‏%
0.92
Under 2.5
54‏%
1
70‏%
0.92
Under 3.5
68‏%
1
73‏%
0.92
Under 4.5
84‏%
1
78‏%
0.92
Under 5.5
92‏%
1
95‏%
0.92